As some of you may know, I love watching television shows in
one big gulp. The entire season. In as few sittings as possible. It's probably
similar to my reading one author's books all at once, like when I went on a
Janet Evanovich run and read all 18 Stephanie Plum/Morelli/Ranger novels.
Scrummy. Even when they were repetitive. Or all of Amanda Quick's novels,
starting with Seduction and moving forward to the Arcane novels. What can I say. I'm a completist.
So, series. What is it about a series that I love so much?
It isn't the soap opera, though I'm sure some of the shows I watch have it.
(Hello Damon/Stefan/Elena!) But when I look at the shows I watch, it is the
characters and the ensemble cast. Big
Bang Theory works so well not because the characters are growing and changing
and arcing. It works because of the cast - and also didn't work when Raj's
sister was added in as a love interest for Leonard. Her character detracted
from the show, though it was fun to watch Amy and Bernadette stand by Penny throughout
the season.
Sometimes, the soap takes over and change has to happen in
order to save the show. Like Vampire Diaries. We ALL wanted Elena to dump
Stefan and choose Damon. But giving in
to the sexual tension can be the death of a show (hello Moonlighting) (and also
goodbye Remington Steele). This year, finally, Elena GETS TO HAVE SEX WITH
DAMON, and I stopped watching it mid-season because without the antici- of
maybe sexy times with Damon- pation, the show got incredibly complicated. So
complicated, in fact, that the cast had to all sit down in one episode and
explain who was killing whom, which werewolf was under which Original's spell,
and who was controlling the witches and on and on and I just didn't care,
because Stefan looked like a big pouty boy and Damon was finally getting his payoff
for being hawt and brooding and misunderstood.
My current marathon is Jethro Gibbs and his team and NCIS.
There is no soap here. It is episodic, a little slapstick, and the sexual
tension is kept incredibly mild. Instead, I am drawn in to watching Gibbs
father his band of merry agents. Of course, it helps that he is hot, though
maybe not Damon hot. He's an alpha who leads his pack and is always always
there for them. As I watched season 1, I was struck by the fact that nobody has
really changed. Even edgy, funky Abby with her tats and her pigtails, still, 9
seaons later, has the same tats and pigtails. Where did her edge go? Wouldn't
someone that out there have changed her style by now? When will McGee stop
being a Probie? And seriously, would the show not work if Tony, finally, grew
up and got a wife and family? But I'm still watching it. Because of Gibbs. If
they take him out of the equation (and if I remember correctly, they will one
of these seasons), then the show will fall apart.
Look at Buffy. Those writers never gave that woman a break
in the romance department. But as I was saying, they were able to remove Angel
from the equation, and the show still flourished. Until that horrific was it 5th
season? The Willow the Bad Witch season, all crackly faced and revengeful? If
only they had given her the Oz for reals, and not just for a season or so. He
made a great addition to the cast. Crackle face did not. I'm still astounded by the choice to shift
time and space and give Buffy a sister. Just give her a fully formed, teenaged
sister. In what, season five. And because the show is paranormal, it could be
explained away and that was that.
But how does this relate to writing. Jayne Ann Krentz/Amanda
Quick/Jayne Castle has been writing series over the last few years. Some that
connect laterally through a single sub genre, and some that connect
unilaterally through all three. But one thing I've noticed is she has very
little connection from one book to the next. You may get a brief scene or two,
but not much more. In her Amarylis/Zinnia/Orchid series, there was a tiny bit
more overlap, but generally she holds each book to its own cast of characters.
Maybe there will be an object that will appear in each, and a few times a
character may be introduced, but don't
expect to get a lovely glimpse of them again the way that Susan
Elizabeth Philips does in her Chicago Stars series. I get the feeling with Jayne Ann
Krentz that when her hero and heroine have solved the crime and admitted their
love, the story is over for her, and the characters can be put to bed.
But when I reach the end of the book, I still want to be in
that world. I still want to know what's going on. Are they happy? Do they still
have friends, even though the world is no longer about to end or neither
character is having to fend off a deranged killer. I care if they marry or have
children or remain friends with characters in other books. Nora Roberts, for
me, is the master when it comes to groups and group scenes. Her ability to
create such authentic composites is incredible. Whether as part of a series
when the Scooby gang is finally altogether, or in one of her stand alones, her
development of separate characters, giving them all there own voice, their own
mannerisms, is quite remarkable.
Tell me which ensemble cast shows or books work for you? Do
you have a favorite? Are you in it for the soap or for Scooby gang? How easily do you grow bored with a series,
book or tv show? Why?